
MARGARET METCALFE: Putting bite on dog
owners
PET owners should reject any legislation to take away
their rights to own their breed of choice. What appeared to be straightforward
legislation has taken away the right to dock tails and whether you agree or
disagree on this issue it seems this is the beginning
of anti-canine legislation to ban breeds of dogs.
Many breeds such as
Staffordshire bull terriers and rottweilers will be on the verge of extinction
if we allow our elected politicians to continue passing legislation without fair
community consultation with breed clubs and pet owners. First was the
highly-emotive banning of tail-docking, then mandatory micro-chipping of all
pets and now we have seen the introduction into State law of banning the
exhibition of docked breeds and the proposal for de-sexing of all dogs and cats.
As the dog fraternity knows, next will be the banning of breeds.
Breed-specific legislation (BSL) comes in many forms from extra insurance
and licenses, to outright bans of particular breeds. It usually comes about
after a dog attack and it generally targets the dog breed the attacking dog most
resembles. Politicians attempt to curb dog bites by implementing policies
focused specifically on these breeds. BSL will be expensive to implement and
enforce. Determining a dog's breed or mix is extremely difficult, often
resulting in mistaken identities.
BSL will not stop dog
attacks or bites. All it achieves is an increasing financial burden on taxpayers
and animal welfare. It doesn't stop irresponsible owners. It doesn't educate
anyone about responsible dog ownership. It simply punishes responsible owners
and good dogs.
Many people
mistakenly believe that owners of these perceived so-called dangerous breeds do
not care about public safety. On the contrary, as owners, we are acutely aware
of the need to educate the public and train our pets. As owners, we also realise
the problem of dog bites and dog attacks does not lie within a single
breed.
The problem, ultimately, lies with the individual owner and that
is where the focus of dangerous dog laws should be. Education on responsible pet
ownership is clearly the answer. Blame the owner, not the
dog.
Margaret Metcalfe lives in Corio. As concerned rottweiler owners, she and
her friends have organised rottweiler PR days at the Geelong waterfront
promoting responsible pet ownership and promoting the good character of
well-socialised canines
MEAN OR MALIGNED A DOGGIE DILEMMA

RSPCA PAWS WALK GEELONG MAY
2008
http://www.geelongadvertiser.com.au/article/2008/05/17/14059_news.html

INDY the rottweiler and her owner were
looking forward to promoting the "misunderstood" breed at tomorrow's RSPCA
Million Paws Walk in Geelong.
But that won't be happening because the
Rottweiler Education and Companion Training team says it has been blocked from
the day.
Indi's owner and REACT founder, Margaret
Metcalfe, wanted to distribute brochures at the annual fundraising and awareness
day at Eastern Gardens, but says the RSPCA was going to slug her with a site
fee.
"We felt we could enhance their day by offering
an educational tool for the event and the Geelong community," she said.
"The $80 site fee would have to come out of my
own pocket, but it's not that easy; I'm a struggling family person, like
everyone else."
A statewide German shepherd club, with a paid
up membership base, will provide equipment and trained dog demonstrations to
dodge the site fee.
Ms Metcalfe said her group had a rottweiler who
could pull a wagon for children's rides, but did not want to put the dog through
the torment.
"That's probably a bit hard on one dog to be
carting kids all day; that's a little bit cruel," she said.
"Our group is totally un-funded, money comes
out of our own pockets.
"With the rottweiler being a very popular but
misunderstood breed, it's a real shame the RSPCA has put dollars before
educational opportunities."
Volunteer and walk organiser Kerry Wench said
the RSPCA needed a monetary return on its investment, and hoped to raise about
$5000 tomorrow.
"We need to be cautious about who we have
involved and what value they're adding," she said.
"We need the groups to be formally involved ...
rather than coming along and taking advantage of all of our resources and hard
work."
Ms Wench said she had a phone conversation with
Ms Metcalfe but was not convinced REACT would add sufficient value.
She said she left a message for Ms
Metcalfe to find out more about the group, but her call was not returned.
DOGS ON THE MARCH


|